May 8th, 2008 - The Oklahoman
Why companies look here for
data center sites
By Jim Stafford
Business Writer
Oklahoma's low cost of living, land and electrical
power have made it one of the nation's most inviting
data center locations, according to a New Jersey
location consulting company.
As if last year's location of a massive
Google server farm near Pryor wasn't enough
evidence, New Jersey-based The
Boyd Co. released a survey Wednesday that listed
Tulsa among the nation's most attractive data center
locations.
In its report, "Banking and Financial Services: A
Comparative Cost Analysis for Information Assurance
Operations,” The
Boyd Co. found that Tulsa offered the seventh
lowest costs for operating a data center among 45
cities compared.
The consulting firm used criteria that included
labor costs, cost of construction, electrical power,
property and sales taxes, heating and air
conditioning costs and corporate travel costs for a
data center of 125,000 square feet with 75
employees.
Total annual cost for Tulsa for such a data center
would be $12.06 million, less than half the cost of
New York City, the nation's highest-cost locale for
a server farm. It would cost $28.06 million to
operate the same data center in the Big Apple,
according to the survey.
"This is the white-hot industry now,” said
John A. Boyd, consultant for The
Boyd Co.
Background to demand
Demand to meet federal privacy regulations, a
growing amount of digitized data and the need to
geographically separate data storage from corporate
locations are driving demand to build data centers,
Boyd said.
"You have, No. 1, federal compliance; No. 2, this
unprecedented amount of digitalization and there are
more people in the system, unprecedented
utilization; corporations need to keep this
information digitalized, safe and secure,” he said.
"We are projecting the industry to grow about 30 to
40 percent this year alone.”
Founded in 1975 as an independent site selection
consulting firm, The
Boyd Co. claims among its clients
JPMorgan Chase,
PNC Bank,
Visa International, PW Funding,
Pepsico and others.
Boyd was in Oklahoma City Wednesday to meet with
former clients and to unveil the survey.
Oklahoma — and Tulsa specifically — won points as a
data center site for the state's "pro business”
environment that includes passage last year of a law
that permits data center operators to keep their
power usage numbers secret for "proprietary”
reasons.
"Your governor,
Brad Henry, is a pro-business Democrat,” Boyd
said. "His reputation is really as a rock-star in
the eyes of the corporate world.”
Why else is state attractive?
Other attributes that make the state attractive to
companies seeking locations to house their off-site
computer servers: Oklahoma's reputation for not
being a "litigious” state; our geographic
neutrality, meaning that it's about midway between
East and West coasts; cheap land costs; and low cost
for electricity, which is a major component.
On the negative side, Boyd identified the state as
one that requires companies to make immediate
notification of a data breach to its clients, which
opens them up to class-action lawsuits. "That is a
new cottage industry in civil law,” he said of the
lawsuits filed in the wake of news of security
breaches.
The Oklahoma findings were confirmed by
John Parsons, chief executive officer at
Perimeter Technology Center, which operates data
centers in both Oklahoma City and Tulsa.
Perimeter is developing a 21-acre site in far
western Oklahoma City on which it plans to build 10
data center buildings. The first one is scheduled to
open later this year.
"Buying the land, building the four walls, a lot of
the labor to go into installing the infrastructure,
you are just going to be a lot more competitive in
the small market areas that Oklahoma can offer,”
Parsons said. "Ongoing, the labor pool is going to
be less expensive, yet Oklahoma still has a pretty
healthy IT labor pool to choose from.
"And then, obviously, your power costs ongoing are
going to be the No. 1 factor.”
Why city rates just as well
Although Oklahoma City was not among the 45 cities
surveyed by The
Boyd Co.,
Parsons said operating costs here are no higher
than those for his Tulsa data center.
"It's interesting because Oklahoma City has many of
the same attributes as Tulsa,” Parsons said. "In
fact, our power costs here from OG&E are lower than
our Tulsa facility power costs.”
Ranked as the nation's lowest cost site for data
centers was Sioux Falls, S.D., with an annual
projected operating cost of about $11.2 million.
Other cities ranked below Tulsa for costs were
Council Bluffs, Iowa; Rolla, Mo.; Winston/Salem,
N.C.; Bloomington, Ind.; and Huntsville, Ala.
« Back to Article List
|