May 3rd, 2007 - News Article
Business Viewpoint:
Disaster recovery preparedness crucial for
businesses
By JOHN PARSONS
5/3/2007 10:31 AM
While events that can cause
interruptions or glitches at businesses loom
year-round, it's the springtime tornado season that
really brings the topic of disaster recovery into
focus for business owners and employees alike.
Mother Nature isn't singling out the
great state of Oklahoma -- virtually every part of
the country has natural disasters to fret about,
from hurricanes on the East and Gulf coasts to
earthquakes on the West Coast.
But what's most surprising is that natural disasters
cause less than 5 percent of all business
interruptions nationwide. These events can vary in
scope, from short-term power failure to a complete
facility loss.
Taking the lion's share of the blame, either
directly or indirectly, are manmade causes ranging
from chemical spills to terrorist attacks. Sixteen
months ago, dozens of downtown Tulsa businesses
shared this experience when a water main break
resulted in power and communications losses for
days.
With today's reliance on information technology,
even a single wrong keystroke, whether by accident
or sabotage, can bring down entire networks,
effectively freezing productivity for what seems
like indefinite periods. Unfortunately, most of
these crippling events
don't have a particular season --
management and/or business owners must worry about
them 365 days a year.
These events can be extremely costly in terms of
revenue, reputation and resources. And that's only
when a business is able to recover at all. More than
80 percent of the businesses substantially affected
by Hurricane Katrina, and without a business
continuity plan in place, never recovered.
So it's easy to understand why having an effective,
routinely updated and tested business continuity
plan is so critical for every organization.
Unfortunately, a company with just such a plan is
the exception rather than the rule. It's not because
management chose to roll the dice with shareholder
assets, but simply because of the complexities that
surround the creation and testing of truly effective
plans.
A plan's creation process alone requires that an
organization objectively evaluate areas where it is
vulnerable, department by department, taking into
account both physical and technical concerns.
It would be cost prohibitive to include an
elimination and/or mitigation strategy for each area
of vulnerability found. Rather, each area requires a
cost-benefit analysis. This quantifies the fiscal
and physical impact to an organization based on that
particular area of vulnerability and compares it
with the cost of creating a recovery solution.
Once the evaluation is complete, a plan continuity
process must be created. This plan must provide
specific response instructions for employees to
follow during an emergency.
These protocols must encompass all potential
personal safety, technology and general business
events specific to an organization. The plan must
identify and document specific procedures for
efficient, cost-effective recovery of disrupted
infrastructures, systems, data and processes.
It's easy to see that while the goal of a business
continuity plan is simple -- to minimize down time
while protecting employee welfare and company assets
-- creating the simple solution is not.
And, of course, creating the plan is just the first
step in the process. We have yet to take into
account the complexities of deploying each phase of
the plan, keeping employees properly trained to use
it, and regularly testing and updating the plan.
Regardless of the complexities in creating, testing
and maintaining an effective business continuity
plan, it certainly beats the alternative when a
disaster is headed your way.
John Parsons is CEO of Perimeter Technology, which
manages corporate information technology
infrastructure via data centers in Tulsa and
Oklahoma City.
To inquire about writing a Business Viewpoint
column, e-mail a short outline of the article to
Business Editor John Stancavage at
john.stancavage@tulsaworld.com.
The column should focus on a business trend; outlook
for the city, state or industry; or discuss a topic
of interest in a particular area of expertise.
Articles should not promote the writer's business or
be overtly political.
By JOHN
PARSONS
« Back to Article List
|